Copy-ready prompt
Using REFERENCE_0 and REFERENCE_1 as the source of messy handwritten study notes, their content was transformed into concise vertical Japanese teaching infographics for quick sharing with teachers. The core themes of narrative text reading curriculum design were retained, but the content was organized visually rather than simply copying the note pages. A sophisticated white background layout was created, featuring navy blue chapter titles, rounded cards, simple flat icons, arrows, checkmarks, and color-coded boxes. A main heading was added.{argument name="headline text" default="Designing lessons to foster reading skills"} and subtitle{argument name="subtitle text" default="~A class that deepens interpretation by using descriptions as a basis and starting from discrepancies~"} The infographic is divided into seven numbered sections and a final summary column: 1) Basic course structure, divided into four steps: facts (description) → explanation → meaning → personal expression; 2) Three stages of learning depth, labeled as: low: superficial understanding, medium: interpretation formation, high: meaning reconstruction; 3) Question design, including the conditions for good questions, question process, and specific example prompts; 4) Key points for improving dialogue quality, including two comparison cards: NG (inadequate) and target dialogue, and keyword tags: comparison, association, reinterpretation; 5) The most important role of the teacher, focusing on making "zre" (cognitive bias/difference) visible, including cards for specific actions and NG actions; 6) Assessment and observation, including two cards: observation points and methods; 7) The meta-perspective of curriculum improvement is presented as five interconnected cards: connection to the previous material, enhancing language sensitivity, utilizing the initial "zure," creating "shared consensus," and reviewing learning. This concludes with a striking summary statement.{argument name="summary statement" default="A lesson that deepens interpretation by using descriptions as a basis and starting from discrepancies."} This concludes with a three-point checklist: reading based on evidence, expanding thinking through dialogue, and giving meaning in your own words. The goal is to make the final result resemble professionally designed Japanese teaching materials, rather than just a photograph of notes.
Prompt breakdown
Using REFERENCE_0 and REFERENCE_1 as the source of messy handwritten study notes, their content was transformed into concise vertical Japanese teaching infographics for quick sharing with teachers.
The core themes of narrative text reading curriculum design were retained, but the content was organized visually rather than simply copying the note pages.
A sophisticated white background layout was created, featuring navy blue chapter titles, rounded cards, simple flat icons, arrows, checkmarks, and color-coded boxes.
A main heading was added.{argument name="headline text" default="Designing lessons to foster reading skills"} and subtitle{argument name="subtitle text" default="~A class that deepens interpretation by using descriptions as a basis and starting from discrepancies~"} The infographic is divided into seven numbered sections and a final summary column: 1) Basic course structure, divided into four steps: facts (description) → explanation → meaning → personal expression; 2) Three stages of learning depth, labeled as: low: superficial understanding, medium: interpretation formation, high: meaning reconstruction; 3) Question design, including the conditions for good questions, question process, and specific example prompts; 4) Key points for improving dialogue quality, including two comparison cards: NG (inadequate) and target dialogue, and keyword tags: comparison, association, reinterpretation; 5) The most important role of the teacher, focusing on making "zre" (cognitive bias/difference) visible, including cards for specific actions and NG actions; 6) Assessment and observation, including two cards: observation points and methods; 7) The meta-perspective of curriculum improvement is presented as five interconnected cards: connection to the previous material, enhancing language sensitivity, utilizing the initial "zure," creating "shared consensus," and reviewing learning.











